Start here

If you read one page on this site, read this one

Sixty-one lessons is a lot. This page is what they add up to.

Nothing here is a shortcut, and none of it will make you money on its own. These are the things that decide whether you are still trading in a year — which is the prerequisite for everything else.

---

The ten that matter

1. Position size is calculated, never chosen

This removes more accounts than any other single mistake.

`` Size = (Balance × Risk %) ÷ (Stop distance × Value per unit) ``

The lot size you "usually trade" is not an input. Take your normal 0.10 lots from EURUSD to gold and you have roughly quadrupled your risk — and nothing on the screen will tell you.

Decide the loss first. The chart decides the distance. The size falls out of the two.

2. Recovery is not symmetric with loss

This is why size, not strategy, decides who survives. When choosing a risk percentage, read the recovery column — not the drawdown column.

3. Journal one field above all: did I follow my plan?

Yes or no. Nothing else.

After forty trades, split your results by it. Almost every trader finds their rule-following trades profitable and their improvised ones not — often by a wide margin. Almost none of them believed it before seeing their own numbers.

Your broker already records profit and loss. Nothing else records this.

4. A stop never moves away from price

Toward profit is fine. Away is never permitted, for any reason, on any timeframe.

At the moment your stop is about to be hit, you stop choosing whether to accept a 1R loss and start choosing between a certain small loss and an uncertain large one. People reliably choose the second, and that preference is what turns a 2% loss into a 25% one.

A rule with exceptions is a rule you will negotiate with at the worst possible moment.

5. Set a daily loss limit

Two losing trades, or 3% of the account. When you hit it, the platform closes.

The reason is not arithmetic. After consecutive losses, judgement measurably degrades — you take setups you would normally skip and size up to recover faster. The limit removes you from the market at exactly the moment you are least fit to be in it.

Almost every account-ending day has the same shape: a normal loss, a revenge trade, then something much larger to fix both.

6. Multiply your spread by your trade count

A 1.2 pip spread feels like nothing. Now run it forward:

On a $5,000 account, a scalper pays roughly the entire account in spread each year. The strategy has to work by nearly 100% before the trader sees a cent — and this never appears in a backtest.

7. Ten trades tell you nothing

One hundred is a working estimate. Three hundred is reasonably reliable.

You do not know anything about a system you have not run 100 times as written. The sentence "I've tried everything and nothing works" almost always means "I have never run one thing properly once."

8. Five positions can be one trade

Long EURUSD, long GBPUSD, long AUDUSD, short USDJPY — that is one bet: the dollar falls. At "2% each" you are risking 8% on a single view, and one headline moves all four together.

Keep a limit per currency, not just per trade.

9. Thirty seconds before every entry

Open one timeframe above the one you trade. Write the direction in a single sentence:

*"Daily is up. Last swing low 3,381. Longs only."*

If you cannot write that sentence, you do not have a view — you have a chart and an urge.

Those thirty seconds will prevent more losses than any indicator you ever add.

10. Three indicators agreeing is one opinion

RSI, Stochastic and CCI are variations on the same calculation over the same data. When they agree, you have not gained three confirmations — you have seen one number three times.

The test: could these two ever disagree? If not, they are the same input.

Real confluence comes from things that answer different questions: structure, the economic calendar, the higher timeframe, and what related markets are doing.

---

Notice what is missing

Not one of the ten is an entry technique.

That is not an oversight. New traders spend most of their attention deciding where to enter, while what actually removes them is how much they risked, whether they moved the stop, and whether they followed their own rules.

Entry matters — but far less than it feels, and not in the way most people expect.

---

Entry technique, honestly

Here is the part that is rarely said plainly:

A better entry does not make you right more often. It makes your stop shorter — which improves your reward-to-risk on the same idea.

That is the whole mechanism. Two traders with identical analysis and identical targets can have completely different results, because one entered where the stop had to be 60 points away and the other entered where it could be 20.

So the question is never "where will price go?" It is "where can I be wrong cheaply?"

Four techniques follow from that. All four are taught structurally in the courses; this is where they sit together.

Technique 1 — The retest, not the break

When a level breaks, the impatient entry is on the break itself. The better one is on the pullback that retests it.

The cost: the retest does not always come. You will miss trades.

Why that cost is acceptable: a missed trade costs nothing. A trade taken with three times the necessary stop costs three times the necessary money, every time it loses.

Technique 2 — The sweep and reclaim

The single highest-value entry in the whole curriculum.

Stops cluster just beyond obvious levels — below swing lows, above swing highs, at round numbers, and most densely at equal highs and equal lows. Price frequently trades *through* those levels, fills those orders, and reverses.

The sequence:

1. Price pushes beyond an obvious level
2. The candle closes back inside
3. You enter on that close
4. Stop goes beyond the sweep extreme

Why this is a good entry: the people who traded the break are now trapped, and their exits push price your way. And your stop sits beyond the point where everyone else's stop already got taken — the most-tested place on the chart.

The cost: the stop is wider than the obvious one, so you must reduce position size to keep the money risked identical. A wider stop at the same lot size is not caution — it is more risk wearing a disguise.

Technique 3 — Wait for the close

A candle is only that candle when the period ends.

The same price action is a sweep or a genuine break depending entirely on where it settles. A "hammer" thirty minutes into a four-hour candle can close as a large red body.

Acting mid-candle means trading a shape that does not exist yet. Waiting costs you a slightly worse price and removes an entire category of loss.

Technique 4 — Demand displacement

Not all breaks are equal.

• Displacement: a large-bodied candle closing decisively beyond the level. Someone was behind it.
• Drift: small, overlapping candles that barely close beyond. Nobody was.

Most failed breakout trades are drift breaks traded as though they were displacements. Requiring a decisive close filters a large share of them, at the price of a marginally worse entry.

The rule that ties them together

All four techniques do the same thing: they trade a worse price for a shorter stop or better information.

That is always the trade-off, and it is nearly always worth making. The entry that feels best — fast, early, at the good price — is usually the one that requires the widest stop and offers the least confirmation.

---

What to do this week

1. Calculate size for every trade. Not once. Every trade.
2. Write your daily loss limit on paper and put it next to the screen.
3. Add one journal column: "followed plan — yes/no."
4. Before each entry, write the higher-timeframe sentence.
5. Take one setup and run it 50 times without changing it.

Five things. None requires learning anything new. Together they matter more than any strategy you will find this year.

---

One honest note

This curriculum was written with care, and its claims are checkable — but writing about trading is not the same as trading.

Where anything here conflicts with what you observe in your own journal, over a real sample, your journal is right. Change it.